Will optional PSI help?
So the vacillation is yet to be over. The National Board of Revenue
(NBR)'s decision to stick to pre-shipment inspection (PSI), though as
an optional practice, seems to suggest a lack of belief in its own
capacity to shoulder the responsibility of customs valuation. It comes
as a partial reversal, if not an u-turn from the government's earlier
decision to do away with PSI by phases -- a practice followed for
around a decade in Bangladesh to ease valuation-related problems
faced by the customs authorities. To this end, the NBR has decided
to offer the existing four PSI companies the job of conducting
optional pre-shipment inspection of imported goods. The curious
part of the government's decision is that making PSI optional is not
being mentioned as a step in the direction of gradually scrapping it.
No doubt, the government is in a dilemma whether it can face up to
the task of customs valuation on its own, despite repeated
announcements of customs automation, believed to provide a good
respite in the intricacies of the job.
Mandatory introduction of PSI, in some countries including
Bangladesh, was mainly intended to ensure that imports comply with
the stipulated regulations. Non-compliance with these regulations
can result in the loss of duty and tax revenue, loss of foreign
exchange reserves and importation of substandard or prohibited
goods. To be more precise, the objective commonly attributed to it is
that PSI maximises duty collections. By undertaking duty assessment
in the country of export, the system offers no opportunity to
unscrupulous importers to prevail upon the customs people to assign
lower rates on arrival of the goods.
It is in keeping with the above that when the NBR introduced
mandatory PSI in the year, 2000, on the transaction value of
imported goods, the decision was welcomed by many including the
media mainly because of the apparent virtues of the system, which,
among others, included transparency. However, over the years, it
has come to light that the system is shorn of much of its virtues.
There were reported complaints of abuse in the name of fixing
transaction value, allowing sub-standard even at times restricted or
prohibited goods to be shipped. To address the issue, the
government instituted a taskforce in the year, 2009, to suggest
measures, and if felt appropriate, suggest a mechanism of phasing
out. The decision of phasing out came in the wake of the taskforce's
report.
Understandably, the decision to phase out PSI was meant to part
with a redundant exercise in an age of technology with automated
customs classification, valuation and assessment readily available.
Stopping the widely reported practices of misdeclaration and
improper fixation of transaction value also calls for an end to the
practice. With the optional practice on, it is not clear how long the
government plans to get along with it. If it is meant to be part of the
phase-out process, it is imperative that the government works out a
roadmap. There is a state of uncertainty at the moment as there is
also the need to frame new rules to suit the optional PSI.
Source:
Published : Wednesday, 28 August 2013
www.thefinancialexpress-bd.com